<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>CtW Investment Group Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3</id>
   <updated>2008-04-28T18:12:45Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.36</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Some Articles of Interest</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/some_articles_of_interest.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.297</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-28T17:56:24Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-28T18:12:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Financial Week - Broker vote zaps shareholder might: Activists say retail brokerages provided majorities for WaMu directors; NYSE rule change still MIA. [Jeff Nash, April 28, 2008] &quot;The controversial practice of broker voting is once again in the spotlight, thanks...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9" label="broker votes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23" label="shareholder activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3" label="Washington Mutual" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<em>Financial Week</em> - Broker vote zaps shareholder might: Activists say retail brokerages provided majorities for WaMu directors; NYSE rule change still MIA. <a href="http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/REG/694771377">[Jeff Nash, April 28, 2008]</a>

<blockquote>"The controversial practice of broker voting is once again in the spotlight, thanks to Washington Mutual's highly contentious annual shareholder meeting earlier this month."</blockquote>
<em>
Christian Science Monitor</em> - Proxy ballots: your chance to make a difference
Don't toss that envelope. Shareholder resolutions address issues ranging from executive pay to human rights. <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0428/p14s02-wmgn.html">[Steve Dinnen, April 28, 2008] </a>

<blockquote>"With this year's proxy season in full swing, investors are demanding an explanation of loans that not only hurt home buyers but also trashed the balance sheets of many companies that provided the funds.

"CtW Investment Group, for one, is suggesting that union pension plans it advises vote against certain directors of huge financial-services concerns tied to the foreclosure crisis."</blockquote>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Financial News: Merrill Opts for Annual Board Elections, Following Campaign Led by CtW Inv Grp</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/financial_news_merrill_opts_fo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.295</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-25T14:08:15Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-25T15:09:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Shanny Basar of Financial News writes: “Merrill Lynch is proposing that from next year all board members are elected annually for one-year terms following a campaign led by CtW Investment Group, an umbrella body representing union pension funds, against banks...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="28" label="board elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26" label="declassification" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25" label="Merrill Lynch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Shanny Basar of Financial News <a href="http://www.financialnews-us.com/index.cfm?page=ushome&contentid=2450479744&uid=5008-6704-162514-352342">writes</a>: 
 
<blockquote>“Merrill Lynch is proposing that from next year all board members are elected annually for one-year terms following a campaign led by CtW Investment Group, an umbrella body representing union pension funds, against banks that have written down billions of dollar related to the credit crisis.

“In January, CtW Investment Group had written to four Merrill directors asking them to describe what they did to protect shareholders from excessive mortgage-related risk over the past two years.”</blockquote>

The declassification was also received coverage by <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200804241714DOWJONESDJONLINE001315_FORTUNE5.htm">CNNMoney.com</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/04/24/afx4931852.html">Forbes</a>, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D908FJEG0.htm">Business Week</a>, and <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/s/merrill-to-trim-director-terms/newsanalysis/banking/10413716.html?puc=googlen&cm_ven=GOOGLEN&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA">TheStreet.com</a>.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Merrill Lynch to Declassify Board</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/merrill_lynch_to_declassify_bo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.294</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-25T13:42:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-25T14:32:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>From a Merrill Lynch press release (April 24, 2008): &quot;The Board of Directors regularly reviews its governance practices to ensure it is operating efficiently, effectively, and in the best interests of shareholders,&quot; said John Thain, chairman and chief executive officer....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="28" label="board elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26" label="declassification" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25" label="Merrill Lynch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[From a <a href="http://ml.com/?id=7695_7696_8149_88278_95339_96863&ML.grp=HL">Merrill Lynch press release</a> (April 24, 2008): 

"The Board of Directors regularly reviews its governance practices to ensure it is operating efficiently, effectively, and in the best interests of shareholders," said John Thain, chairman and chief executive officer. 

"In discussions with investors, including recent conversations with <strong>CtW Investment Group</strong>, we have shared the board's growing consensus that annual director elections are becoming a best practice. Today the board agreed to move to this approach next year. Annual director elections will ensure that our investors have a regular opportunity to express their confidence in the performance of the board and management."]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Leadership Changes at CalPERS, CalSTRS</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/leadership_changes_at_calpers.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.292</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-24T13:59:28Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T15:52:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Yesterday both the California Public Employees&apos; Retirement System and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System announced executive shake-ups. At CalPERS, the Chief Investment Officer Russell Read announced he was leaving, to “pursue his long-standing interest in investing in companies that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="21" label="California Pension Funds" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7" label="CalPERS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="19" label="CalSTRS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Yesterday both the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System announced executive shake-ups.

At CalPERS, the Chief Investment Officer Russell Read <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aXAmbgIQw2ak">announced he was leaving,</a> to “pursue his long-standing interest in investing in companies that are developing environmentally friendly technologies,”  Read will be replaced for the interim by Anne Stausboll, CalPERS Chief Operating Investment Officer. 

CalSTRS yesterday announced that it had <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080423006100&newsLang=en">appointed a new head of corporate governance</a>. 

Michael McCauley comes from the Florida State Board of Administration and currently co-chairs CII’s International Corporate Governance Committee as well as serving as a member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Standing Advisory Group. 

McCauley will help CalSTRS expand their engagement with “international corporate governance issues and examining the relationship between executive compensation and corporate performance.” 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>State Pension Funds Join CtW in Calling for Exclusion of Broker Votes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/state_pension_funds_join_ctw_i.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.291</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-24T13:46:35Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T15:44:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In a piece today in the New York Post, Kaja Whitehouse reports that “letters are pouring in to WaMu Chairman Kerry Killinger and other board members” on the broker vote issue. She reports: “Among those crying foul are pension funds...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9" label="broker votes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7" label="CalPERS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11" label="CII" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13" label="SEC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5" label="WaMu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3" label="Washington Mutual" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[In a piece today in the New York Post, Kaja Whitehouse <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/04242008/business/funds_cry_foul_over_wamu_vote_107919.htm">reports</a> that “letters are pouring in to WaMu Chairman Kerry Killinger and other board members” on the broker vote issue.

She reports: “Among those crying foul are pension funds from California, Florida, New Jersey and North Carolina, including the granddaddy of all pension funds, the $255 billion California Public Employees Retirement System and the $80 billion New Jersey Division of Investment.

“Several union pension funds are leading the charge, and the Council of Institutional Investors, which represents 140 public, private and union pension funds, is also drafting a letter on this issue, to be released today.”

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>CtW&apos;s Mike Garland Discusses Shareholder Activism on Fox Business News</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/ctws_mike_garland_discusses_sh.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.290</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-23T14:59:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T15:47:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Watch Mike Garland, CtW Investment Group&apos;s director of value strategies, discuss shareholder activism on Fox Business News. There&apos;s also a written piece on shareholder activism around the subprime meltdown. Fox Business reporter Dunstan Prial writes: &quot;For most of this decade,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="17" label="board accountability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="15" label="majority vote" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Watch Mike Garland, CtW Investment Group's director of value strategies, <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/video/index.html">discuss shareholder activism</a> on Fox Business News.

There's also a <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/real-estate/article/subprime-market-melts-shareholders-heated_574414_17.html">written piece</a> on shareholder activism around the subprime meltdown.

Fox Business reporter Dunstan Prial writes: 
<blockquote>
"For most of this decade, incremental change has been seeping into corporate board rooms as investment managers at mutual funds and pension funds have demanded that voting policies for board elections reflect the growing desire for reform.

"More and more companies are adopting majority vote policies for their boards, according to [Mike] Garland, and shifting away from the 'anachronistic methods' that decisively favored the whims of company executives and existing board members.

"'Other institutions are watching,' Garland said. 'We are part of a community of long-term shareholders that are leading the fight to enhance the independence and accountability of corporate directors.'"
</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>WaPo: Online Shareholder Activism &quot;Picks Up Steam&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/wapo_online_shareholder_activi.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.288</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-22T12:03:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T16:00:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It&apos;s been brought to my attention that CtW Investment Group&apos;s Director of Value Strategies Mike Garland was quoted in a column about online shareholder activism in the Sunday Washington Post. In her Kiplinger&apos;s Personal Finance column, Anne Kates Smith writes...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="23" label="shareholder activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[It's been brought to my attention that CtW Investment Group's Director of Value Strategies Mike Garland was quoted in a column about online shareholder activism in the Sunday Washington Post. 

In her Kiplinger's Personal Finance column, Anne Kates Smith <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/18/AR2008041802673.html">writes</a> that "shareholders big and small are putting corporate boards on the hot seat, expressing their views on everything from executive pay to the subprime-mortgage meltdown. The CtW Investment Group, which is affiliated with a coalition of labor unions, wants board members at six financial firms, including Citigroup and Merrill Lynch, to explain what they did to manage subprime-loan risks. Says CtW's Mike Garland: 'Absent compelling explanations, we'll recommend that shareholders vote against reelection.'"
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&quot;Broker Vote Must Go&quot; Says Dow Jones Managing Editor</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/broker_vote_must_go_says_dow_j_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.287</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-21T14:12:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T16:01:16Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In a column that ran on the AP Newswires this weekend, Neal Lipschutz, the senior vice president and managing editor of Dow Jones Newswires, agrees with CtW that the SEC should take action to eliminate the broker vote. In the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9" label="broker votes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11" label="CII" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3" label="Washington Mutual" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[In a column that ran on the AP Newswires this weekend, Neal Lipschutz, the senior vice president and managing editor of Dow Jones Newswires, agrees with CtW that the SEC should take action to eliminate the broker vote.  In the column, titled, "<a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/ap/2008/04/18/point-of-view-if-majority-to-rule-broker-vote-must-go">If majority to rule, 'broker vote' must go</a>,” Lipschultz writes: 
<blockquote>
“Only people who have decided to vote and who are the direct owners of a company's shares should have a say in who represents them on the board of directors.

“That isn't now the case. In a testament to how long some corporate governance controversies can bounce around, the so-called 'broker vote' issue is still alive if not altogether well after years of debate. It should have long ago been relegated to history. Instead, it's become part of a high-profile debate between activist shareholders and the big thrift Washington Mutual Inc.”

</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>R&amp;GW Reports CII to Pressure SEC, Challenge WaMu on Broker Vote Issue</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/rgw_reports_cii_to_pressure_se.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.286</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-18T16:06:49Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T16:02:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In this week’s Risk &amp; Governance Weekly Ted Allen reports that the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) plans to send a letter asking WaMu to exclude broker votes from their director election totals. “WaMu is Exhibit A for this proxy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9" label="broker votes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11" label="CII" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13" label="SEC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3" label="Washington Mutual" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[In this week’s Risk & Governance Weekly <a href="http://www.issproxy.com/governance_weekly/2008/081.html">Ted Allen reports</a> that the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) plans to send a letter asking WaMu to exclude broker votes from their director election totals. 

“WaMu is Exhibit A for this proxy season ... of how broker votes are a thumb on the scale for management," CII Deputy Director Amy Borrus told R&GW.

Allen reported that CII will also pressure the SEC to take action on the broker vote issue.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>In the News: CtW Urges SEC to Eliminate Broker Vote</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/in_the_news_ctw_urges_sec_to_e_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.285</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-18T15:12:16Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T16:03:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>“U.S. investor rights advocates are stepping up calls for reforms of corporate director elections, saying regulators should bar ‘legalized ballot-box stuffing’ by stock brokers who vote without instructions from their clients.” Reuters, Lifting the Lid: Activists Renew Calls For Barring...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9" label="broker votes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13" label="SEC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3" label="Washington Mutual" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[“U.S. investor rights advocates are stepping up calls for reforms of corporate director elections, saying regulators should bar ‘legalized ballot-box stuffing’ by stock brokers who vote without instructions from their clients.” <em><strong>Reuters</strong>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN1746169720080417?sp=true">Lifting the Lid: Activists Renew Calls For Barring Broker Votes</a></em>

 “The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's failure to act on a broker-voting rule has  'disenfranchised' investors by triggering the re-election of two Washington Mutual Inc. directors, a group that advises union-pension funds said.” <em><strong>Bloomberg</strong>, SEC Inaction on Broker-Votes Affected WaMu Election, Group Says</em>

“Union pension advisers, after achieving mixed results in their battle to oust directors at troubled thrift Washington Mutual Inc., are taking the next stage of their fight to the Securities and Exchange Commission.” <em><strong>Daily Deal</strong>, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com">CtW Asks SEC To Rule On Broker Votes</a></em>

 “CtW Investment Group urged Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox to approve a proposal by the New York Stock Exchange to eliminate uninstructed broker votes in all director elections.” <em><strong>CNNMoney.com</strong>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200804171150DOWJONESDJONLINE000955_FORTUNE5.htm">CtW Investment Group Urges SEC To Eliminate Broker Votes</a>
</em>
“In majority-vote elections, some directors have been re-elected by the margin provided by the uninstructed broker votes, prevailing over shareholders who would otherwise have had enough votes to defeat nominees, Mr. Patterson pointed out.” <em><strong>Pensions & Investments</strong>, <a href="http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080417/DAILY/339817296">SEC Asked To Stop Unguided Broker Voting</a></em>

And on the blogs: 

“Kudos to CtW Investment Group for bringing the issue of broker votes back to the forefront with their well-publicized letter to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox…It’s time for the SEC to recognize the 21st century demands of investors and give broker votes the death sentence.” <em><strong>Proxy Matters Blog</strong>, <a href="http://proxymatters.com/2008/04/18/death-to-broker-votes/">Death To Broker Votes</a>
</em>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>CtW Investment Group urges SEC to promptly eliminate broker votes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/ctw_investment_group_urges_sec.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.283</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-17T13:50:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-17T18:01:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Today, in a letter to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, the CtW Investment Group urged prompt approval of a longstanding NYSE proposal to eliminate uninstructed broker votes in all director elections. CtW pointed to WaMu’s annual meeting on Tuesday, where Director-nominees...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Today, in a <a href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/uploads/media/CtW_Inv_Grp_to_Cox_Arp_16_2008.pdf">letter</a> to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, the CtW Investment Group <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200804171150DOWJONESDJONLINE000955_FORTUNE5.htm">urged prompt approval of a longstanding NYSE proposal</a> to eliminate uninstructed broker votes in all director elections. CtW pointed to WaMu’s annual meeting on Tuesday, where Director-nominees James Stever and Charles Lillis failed to garner majority shareholder votes, yet will be seated because broker votes were counted towards their totals.

“With rising levels of shareholder opposition to directors in uncontested elections, it is essential that the SEC eliminate broker votes before shareholders are disenfranchised yet again,” said CtW Investment Group Executive Director William Patterson. “Nearly eighteen months after the NYSE proposal was submitted, we cannot understand why the SEC has not even put it out for public comment.”

Last year, calls for the SEC to act on the 2006 NYSE proposal increased after CVS/Caremark Director Roger Headrick was re-elected <a href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/uploads/media/CtW_Inv_Grp_to_Cox_Jun_6_2007.pdf">only because of broker votes</a> (Mr. Headrick later resigned). 

Since most brokers support management as a matter of policy, their ability to exercise discretion over certain uninstructed client shares has been criticized as “legalized ballot stuffing” by parties who don’t share investors’ economic interests.

For more information on the broker vote issue, check out a piece in the Wall Street Journal by Kara Scannell ['Broker Votes': Opponents May Win One," WSJ, 6/13/07, no link].

In the piece, Scannell examines the controversy surrounding broker votes: 
<blockquote>
"Complaints about the system go back for years. In 2003, the proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services said that the system was hurting investors' ability to express dissatisfaction. At Tyco International Ltd. and Sprint, now Sprint Nextel Corp., ISS said, unhappiness with the companies' boards was "watered down by broker votes." 
...
"Already, NYSE Euronext's New York Stock Exchange has proposed amending the broker-vote rule. It would redefine director elections as "non routine," no longer allowing brokers to vote shares without instruction. At the same time, the Securities and Exchange Commission is reviewing the entire voting system, from allowing companies to send proxies to shareholders over the Internet to allowing shareholders to nominate their own directors on corporate ballots. The NYSE rule change would require SEC approval."
</blockquote>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pugh resignation a historic victory for institutional investors</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/pugh_resignation_a_historic_vi.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.282</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-16T19:09:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-17T18:05:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The removal of Mary Pugh from Washington Mutual’s board shows that the reforms intended to improve corporate governance and increase shareholder accountability in the U.S. have successfully empowered institutional investors to affect change at companies they own. News clips highlighting...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[The removal of Mary Pugh from Washington Mutual’s board shows that the reforms intended to improve corporate governance and increase shareholder accountability in the U.S. have successfully empowered institutional investors to affect change at companies they own.

News clips highlighting the significance of Pugh’s resignation: 

<strong>Financial Week</strong>: <a href="http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/REG/756681128"> Analysis - Activist shareholders starting to make inroads</a>
“The surprise resignation yesterday of a Washington Mutual director is the latest sign that activist shareholders are actually having some impact on the way companies are run…This renewed focus on board accountability isn’t likely to die out anytime soon. Indeed, corporate boards that have been targeted by activist campaigns should be prepared for a tough fight.”

<strong>Financial Times</strong>: <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c754825c-0b2f-11dd-8ccf-0000779fd2ac.html">WaMu Board Director Forced Out</a>
“The resignation of Mary Pugh, who chaired WaMu’s finance committee, represents a big victory for shareholder groups seeking boardroom accountability for the massive mortgage-related losses that have plagued the largest US banks and brokerage houses in recent months…Corporate governance experts said the resignation was a major victory for the union-backed coalition.”

<strong>BusinessWeek</strong>: <a href=http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9967.1387212337 ">Shareholders Score at WaMu</a>
“Is today’s WaMu meeting a tipping point for shareholder success? It’s too early to tell, but WaMu’s succumbing to executive pay criticism, the departure of Mary Pugh, and the high vote on the CEO-Chairman role is indicative of a new era of shareholders’ weight in the often arcane world of corporate governance.”

<strong>Portfolio</strong>: <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/04/15/Washington-Mutal-Director-Quits">Activists Claim a Scalp </a>
“Shareholder activists have made a lot of noise but have not been able to point to many changes this proxy season—until today. Mary Pugh, a member of the board of Washington Mutual for nine years, has resigned.”

<strong>Forbes</strong>: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/2008/04/15/washington-mutual-loss-markets-equity-cx_mlm_0415markets43.html">Blood on the Floor at WaMu</a>
“Activist shareholders who were pushing to oust WaMu's finance committee chairwoman, Mary E. Pugh, had something to celebrate. The bank said Pugh had resigned from the board. CtW Investment Group, part of the Change to Win federation of U.S. labor unions, has been leading an effort to hold Pugh and other executives accountable for not seeing the writing on the wall leading up to the mortgage meltdown.”
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Union Activists Win One, Washington Mutual&apos;s Bad Day and other headlines from WaMu&apos;s annual meeting</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/blood_on_the_floor_at_wamu_and.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.281</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-16T15:24:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-16T19:21:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A few of our favorite pieces: Financial Week: Union Activists Win One, as WaMu Director Resigns Wall Street Journal: WaMu Revises Pay Plan and Divides Top Post as Holders Press Change Financial News: Activists Win Victory at Washington Mutual TheStreet.com:...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<em>A few of our favorite pieces: </em>

<strong>Financial Week</strong>: <a href="http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/REG/397384250/1036 ">Union Activists Win One, as WaMu Director Resigns</a>

<strong>Wall Street Journal</strong>: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120829015769217071.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">WaMu Revises Pay Plan and Divides Top Post as Holders Press Change</a>

<strong>Financial News</strong>: <a href="http://www.financialnews-us.com/index.cfm?page=ushome&contentid=2450379899&uid=1508-4104-271614-580819">Activists Win Victory at Washington Mutual</a>

<strong>TheStreet.com</strong>: <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10412163/1/wamu-director-resigns-under-pressure.html?puc=newshome">WaMu Director Resigns Under Pressure</a>

<strong>International Business Tribune</strong>: <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20080415/washington-mutual-wamu-mary-pugh.htm">WaMu Finance Chair Resigns Under Pressure</a>

<strong>Puget Sound Business Journal</strong>: <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2008/04/14/daily14.html?jst=b_ln_hl">WaMu Director Quits, Others Voted Down</a>

<strong>Salon</strong>: <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2008/04/15/washington_mutual">Washington Mutual's Bad Day</a>


]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Shareholders Rejected Two Additional WaMu Directors</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/shareholders_rejected_two_addi.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.280</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-15T23:40:39Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-15T23:44:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>CtW calls for resignations of James Stever and Charles Lillis Washington, DC - Pointing to unofficial election returns showing that shareholders rejected two additional WaMu Directors, James Stever and Charles Lillis, the CtW Investment Group called on the WaMu Board...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<em>CtW calls for resignations of James Stever and Charles Lillis </em>
<strong>
Washington, DC -</strong> Pointing to unofficial election returns showing that shareholders rejected two additional WaMu Directors, James Stever and Charles Lillis, the CtW Investment Group called on the WaMu Board to immediately release full election results and demand the resignation of any directors who failed to win majority shareholder votes.

“Washington Mutual shareholders sent an unequivocal message today that they are ready for more independent and accountable Directors,” said CtW Investment Group Executive Director William Patterson. “While we commend Washington Mutual’s Board for promptly accepting Mary E. Pugh’s resignation, we believe that Charles M. Lillis and James E. Stever also failed to win re-election. The Board should immediately disclose detailed election returns, and should demand the resignation of any Directors who failed to win majority support, excluding broker votes.”

The <a href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/uploads/media/CtW_Inv_Grp_to_Reed_Apr_15.pdf">letter</a> cites preliminary election returns showing that shareholders withheld 51.2% from Mr. Lillis, 61.9% from Ms. Pugh, and 50.9% from Mr. Stever. CtW had urged shareholders to withhold from Pugh in response to risk management failures and from Stever in response to poor executive compensation practices. AFSCME also urged withholds from Stever and Lillis.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Comment on Pugh&apos;s Resignation from WaMu Board</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/2008/04/comment_on_pughs_resignation_f.html" />
   <id>tag:www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com,2008:/blog//3.279</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-15T20:34:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-15T21:24:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>CtW Investment Group Executive Director William Patterson released the following statement in response to Mary Pugh’s resignation from the Washington Mutual’s board: “Shareholders at Washington Mutual sent an unequivocal message today that they are ready for more independent and accountable...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anna Mumford</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.ctwinvestmentgroup.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[CtW Investment Group Executive Director William Patterson released the following statement in response to Mary Pugh’s resignation from the Washington Mutual’s board:

“Shareholders at Washington Mutual sent an unequivocal message today that they are ready for more independent and accountable Directors. We commend Washington Mutual’s Board for promptly accepting Ms. Pugh’s resignation and urge them to also demand the resignation of any other Directors who fail to win majority shareholder support.”

Click <a href="http://newsroom.wamu.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=189529&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1129868&highlight">here</a> to see WaMu's press release announcing Pugh's resignation. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
